It’s not even July, and already Obama’s deserting us, in mind, body and spirit.
First, on the FISA capitulation:
“The bill has changed. So I don’t think the security threats have changed, I think the security threats are similar. My view on FISA has always been that the issue of the phone companies per se is not one that overrides the security interests of the American people.”
Really? What about when you said this last week?
“[The bill] does, however, grant retroactive immunity, and I will work in the Senate to remove this provision so that we can seek full accountability for past offenses.”
Evidently the pod people have gotten to him.
Then on the death penalty:
Democrat Barack Obama said Wednesday he disagrees with the Supreme Court’s decision outlawing executions of people who rape children, a crime he said states have the right to consider for capital punishment.
“I have said repeatedly that I think that the death penalty should be applied in very narrow circumstances for the most egregious of crimes,” Obama said at a news conference. “I think that the rape of a small child, 6 or 8 years old, is a heinous crime and if a state makes a decision that under narrow, limited, well-defined circumstances the death penalty is at least potentially applicable, that that does not violate our Constitution.”
So, who gets to define those circumstances, Senator?
And now on the DC gun ban:
I have always believed that the Second Amendment protects the right of individuals to bear arms, but I also identify with the need for crime-ravaged communities to save their children from the violence that plagues our streets through common-sense, effective safety measures. The Supreme Court has now endorsed that view, and while it ruled that the D.C. gun ban went too far, Justice Scalia himself acknowledged that this right is not absolute and subject to reasonable regulations enacted by local communities to keep their streets safe. Today’s ruling, the first clear statement on this issue in 127 years, will provide much-needed guidance to local jurisdictions across the country.
…about what they can’t do to try to protect their citizens.
Maybe there really isn’t a dime’s worth of difference between he and Hillary.
Well, better the $455 went to MoveOn than to the Obama campaign, I guess.
Related posts:
Here is a post from my favorite blogger that is right on point with your post above.
We can only hope Obama is playing the game of politics and that once elected he will do as Bush did and govern completely different than how he ran for the office.
And, of course, we are never going to agree on everything he does or says no matter what happens. No one can get elected in this country (at the presidential level at least) who runs on what the people want. The lamestream media (which should be ignored and boycotted) will make sure anyone who tries to do this will lose.
Should have said also that the lamestream media should be REGULATED, something the FCC no longer does in any noticeable way except to stop people from saying the word shit.