
(1) Figure out how much money is past-due on all those “bad” mortgages (it has to be less than $700 Billion) and LOAN that money to the banks to get them through this “crisis”;
(2) Get the mortgage holders into mediation with their banks and get them to agree on a realistic value of the home at an interest rate/payment schedule that the mortgage holder can afford (if they can’t come to terms, put them in from of a judge);
(3) Figure out where the banks stand after all the mortgages that can be renegotiated are renegotiated;
(4) Figure out which loans were the subject out outright fraud/illegal inducement and prosecute the criminals involved, and make the banks pay a fine into a bailout fund;
(5) And only then, and letting the criminal enterprises fail, take a look at the honest banks and the deficit between what they lent and what they will be repaid, and then talk about a LOAN to cover the difference.
We are not talking about putting the banks back where they would be - with their obscene profits - if all these bad mortgages were paid in full; they must live with the fallout of their bad judgment to at least that extent. We are talking about loaning them the money to make them solvent according to the reasonable renegotiated terms.
Why wouldn’t that work, Sec. Paulson?
Last 2 posts in Economic justice
- First You Were Against the Bailout Before You Were For It - November 20th, 2008
- bush is the gift that keeps on taking - November 19th, 2008
If you liked this post, feel free to subscribe to our rss feeds














4 Comments so far (Add 1 more)
(listed oldest to newest)