headermask image

header image

why?

in donuts we trust

Why do we allow speculators to raise the price of commodities like food and oil by betting on how expensive those same commodities are going to be in the future?

Doesn’t that seem a bit suicidal, like betting against yourself, doubling down each time?

India may be on the right track: India considers suspending trade in food futures

If only we could generate enough political pressure - or even awareness of the problem - to overcome the political clout of the banks, commodities exchanges and brokerage firms.

But that would require an informed populace - and god knows the media can’t have that.

Last 2 posts in Corporate control

Last 2 posts in Economic justice

Last 2 posts in Media

Last 2 posts in Money Party

Sphere: Related Content

If you liked this post, feel free to subscribe to our rss feeds

This entry was written by slim and posted on May 5, 2008 at 4:55 pm and filed under Corporate control, Economic justice, Media, Money Party. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

One Comment

(listed oldest to newest)

  1. From Wikipedia:

    Commodities exchanges usually trade futures contracts on commodities, such as trading contracts to receive something, say corn, in a certain month. A farmer raising corn can sell a future contract on his corn, which will not be harvested for several months, and guarantee the price he will be paid when he delivers; a breakfast cereal producer buys the contract now and guarantees the price will not go up when it is delivered. This protects the farmer from price drops and the buyer from price rises.

    Speculators and investors also buy and sell the futures contracts to make a profit and provide liquidity to the system.

    It is like a covered call in the stock market. Presumably there is an argument it helps smooth out price changes thereby protecting farmers/investors from bigger losses and the subsequent harm that can do to the economy.

    I am not justifying the practice, just passing on what I understand to be the reason. I have been an owner of stock for 20 years and I have never bought a covered call. It never made sense to me to lose the upside appreciation potential in order to minimize the downside potential loss.

    But if I owned 100,000 acres of corn fields, I might see it very differently because I could not sell the unharvested corn at a moment’s notice like I can a stock that I am holding.

    [reply to this]

    1. Above written by bushtoolNo Gravatar on May 5th, 2008 at 6:00 pm (replies, if any, are attributed separately above).
This post is open for your comments

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*
This site is using OpenAvatar based on

Subscribe without commenting