headermask image

header image

and so, the clintons continue to eat their own

elitist

From the Guardian:

The verbal battle between the Democratic presidential hopefuls intensified yesterday, with Hillary Clinton accusing Barack Obama of being “elitist and out of touch”.

Clinton was trying to keep Obama’s bungled comments on small town America in the news, while Obama struck back at her over her stance on gun laws.

At the first opportunity, Clinton went after Obama, accusing him of making “elitist and out of touch” comments.

Clinton, a senator from New York, was referring to remarks Obama made last week at a San Francisco fundraiser. Speaking of working-class voters in old industrial towns decimated by job losses, Obama said: “They get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”

Yes, I wish Obama had said it better, and referred to the GOP as “they” instead of the people who are voting against their own interests. It would have been much better to say, “The Republican Party has played a massive con on the American people, scaring us into fearing for our jobs, our values, and our basic rights while they rob the government blind and move our jobs overseas.” That would have put “them” firmly in “our” camp, and shown “them” who is really on “their” side.

It was inartful, and it may have sounded elitist. But there is no question that Obama is right on this point: people do retreat into what makes them feel comfortable and safe when they are threatened. The problem is, the GOP has made the threat seem like it comes from the libruls/coloreds/feminazis/ homos/atheists instead of from the GOP pulling the economic rug out from under them.

Clinton is tacking so far to the right on this that if Obama is the nominee, she’s given McCain a raft of soundbites to attack him with in the fall.

And, if Clinton is the nominee, how is she supposed to draw all those young, progressive Obama voters to her side after rhetoric like this? Those voters don’t see this as a zero-sum game; they won’t just shift their allegiance to Clinton if Obama is denied the nomination.

Many of them have never voted before, and it will not phase them to skip this election if they feel they have no real choice. We disillusioned voters, who’ve been through the last 20+ years of “electability” compromises and massive strategic blunders by the Democratic party, may have come to expect such disappointments, but idealistic young voters want to vote those ideals, not the lesser of two evils.

Cut the shit, Hillary. Wage an honorable race or get the fuck out.

Sphere: Related Content

If you liked this post, feel free to subscribe to our rss feeds

2 Comments so far (Add 1 more)

(listed oldest to newest)
  1. Hartmann this morning voiced his dismay with Clinton’s rhetoric also. He also pointed out that Hillary’s other half uttered words that were very similar as Obama’s speech against Bush I.

    Guess what’s good for the goose isn’t good for the gander here.

    [reply to this]

    1. Above written by bushtoolNo Gravatar on April 14th, 2008 at 9:58 am (replies, if any, are attributed separately above).
  2. Yes, there are “bitter” people out there, plus there are angry people out there. He just didn’t explain it enough. Our hospitals, schools, etc are in financial positions that are not good. That was never mentioned.

    With all the lost jobs, lost pensions, high prices, mortgage problems, etc,etc, if you are one of the persons effective by this, or your relatives effective by this mess, who in the hell wouldn’t be BITTER?

    One person mentions the truth, and he his being hauled over the coals for it. Maybe the young voters won’t show up, and McBush wins the election. That might be for the best, another 4 years of the same BS we have seen for the last 7+ years.

    Then maybe a whole bunch more of Americans will wake up and realize what they let happen this time around. But the question remains, can we afford 4 more years of Bush policies?

    [reply to this]

    2. Above written by AllenNo Gravatar on April 14th, 2008 at 12:32 pm (replies, if any, are attributed separately above).
This post is open for your comments

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*
This site is using OpenAvatar based on

Subscribe without commenting