<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: this is why guns have no place in the home</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.democracyforvancouver.org/2007/12/19/this-is-why-guns-have-no-place-in-the-home/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.democracyforvancouver.org/2007/12/19/this-is-why-guns-have-no-place-in-the-home/</link>
	<description>Politics of the People</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 21:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: slim</title>
		<link>http://www.democracyforvancouver.org/2007/12/19/this-is-why-guns-have-no-place-in-the-home/#comment-43114</link>
		<dc:creator>slim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracyforvancouver.org/2007/12/19/this-is-why-guns-have-no-place-in-the-home/#comment-43114</guid>
		<description>Same to you, Allen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same to you, Allen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.democracyforvancouver.org/2007/12/19/this-is-why-guns-have-no-place-in-the-home/#comment-43113</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracyforvancouver.org/2007/12/19/this-is-why-guns-have-no-place-in-the-home/#comment-43113</guid>
		<description>Slim, your correct about rednecks in Georgia. That ruling on homeowners is not enforced. But what if the next town over had the same law? And the one after that and so on. Where would the scum go? And bragging about having a stockpile of weapons is stupid. In Kennesaw, they don't have to talk about it, almost everyone knows.

But the fact remains, you cannot lump all firearm owners as being irresponsible. It may sound good, but it's not the truth, other wise millions of people would be in jail.

Everyone to their own opinion, I am not going to argue over this, too much to do in life. 

Anyway, Slim, hope you and yours have a Merry Christmas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slim, your correct about rednecks in Georgia. That ruling on homeowners is not enforced. But what if the next town over had the same law? And the one after that and so on. Where would the scum go? And bragging about having a stockpile of weapons is stupid. In Kennesaw, they don&#8217;t have to talk about it, almost everyone knows.</p>
<p>But the fact remains, you cannot lump all firearm owners as being irresponsible. It may sound good, but it&#8217;s not the truth, other wise millions of people would be in jail.</p>
<p>Everyone to their own opinion, I am not going to argue over this, too much to do in life. </p>
<p>Anyway, Slim, hope you and yours have a Merry Christmas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slim</title>
		<link>http://www.democracyforvancouver.org/2007/12/19/this-is-why-guns-have-no-place-in-the-home/#comment-43111</link>
		<dc:creator>slim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 20:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracyforvancouver.org/2007/12/19/this-is-why-guns-have-no-place-in-the-home/#comment-43111</guid>
		<description>Allen,

Let's get to the facts (real, not imagined).  These numbers are variously from the Police Foundation in DC, the ATF and the FBI:

• There are about 192 million privately-owned firearms in the U.S., of which 65 million are handguns.  About &lt;strong&gt;39%&lt;/strong&gt; (far from 9 out of 10) of households have guns.

• About &lt;strong&gt;30,000 people are killed by firearms each year in the U.S.&lt;/strong&gt;, of which about 39% are murders, 57% are suicides and 2% are accidents (the balance are unknown).  

• In 2005, there were &lt;strong&gt;only 143 justifiable homicides&lt;/strong&gt; (out of approximately 30,000 firearm deaths) in the U.S.  That means that only 0.5% of deaths were self-defense shootings.  Maybe we should have 99.5% fewer guns in the country, too, if only 0.5% are being used in self-defense.

• An abused woman is&lt;strong&gt; 6 times more likely to be murdered&lt;/strong&gt; if there is a handgun in the home.

• The presence of a gun in the home&lt;strong&gt; triples the risk of a homicide&lt;/strong&gt; in the home, and &lt;strong&gt;quintuples the risk of a suicide&lt;/strong&gt;.

• 8-10 children (under 19) are killed with guns  &lt;strong&gt;EVERY DAY&lt;/strong&gt; in the U.S. 

Now, why is it that we need these things again?  What other "tool" do we allow to be owned so widely that is so dangerous to innocent people when used for its intended purpose?  Only cigarettes come to mind, and with the exception of second-hand smoke, the ones who end up dead aren't innocent bystanders.

And as to your comment that, "IMO it is stupid to brag about how many firearms you may or may not have," you contradicted that by saying, "a city in Georgia passed a ordnance that required all homeowners to have a firearm in their home... Makes a person wonder, doesn't it." 

So, which is it - should you advertise that you own a gun, or not?

And re: that "city in Georgia," I lived in Georgia for a long time, and &lt;a href="http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=786" rel="nofollow"&gt;Kennesaw&lt;/a&gt; is the most racist, redneck town you'd never want to visit.  I'm sure whatever burglaries were avoided there have just been pushed to the next town over.  Poverty and crime don't disappear just because you own a gun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allen,</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s get to the facts (real, not imagined).  These numbers are variously from the Police Foundation in DC, the ATF and the FBI:</p>
<p>• There are about 192 million privately-owned firearms in the U.S., of which 65 million are handguns.  About <strong>39%</strong> (far from 9 out of 10) of households have guns.</p>
<p>• About <strong>30,000 people are killed by firearms each year in the U.S.</strong>, of which about 39% are murders, 57% are suicides and 2% are accidents (the balance are unknown).  </p>
<p>• In 2005, there were <strong>only 143 justifiable homicides</strong> (out of approximately 30,000 firearm deaths) in the U.S.  That means that only 0.5% of deaths were self-defense shootings.  Maybe we should have 99.5% fewer guns in the country, too, if only 0.5% are being used in self-defense.</p>
<p>• An abused woman is<strong> 6 times more likely to be murdered</strong> if there is a handgun in the home.</p>
<p>• The presence of a gun in the home<strong> triples the risk of a homicide</strong> in the home, and <strong>quintuples the risk of a suicide</strong>.</p>
<p>• 8-10 children (under 19) are killed with guns  <strong>EVERY DAY</strong> in the U.S. </p>
<p>Now, why is it that we need these things again?  What other &#8220;tool&#8221; do we allow to be owned so widely that is so dangerous to innocent people when used for its intended purpose?  Only cigarettes come to mind, and with the exception of second-hand smoke, the ones who end up dead aren&#8217;t innocent bystanders.</p>
<p>And as to your comment that, &#8220;IMO it is stupid to brag about how many firearms you may or may not have,&#8221; you contradicted that by saying, &#8220;a city in Georgia passed a ordnance that required all homeowners to have a firearm in their home&#8230; Makes a person wonder, doesn&#8217;t it.&#8221; </p>
<p>So, which is it - should you advertise that you own a gun, or not?</p>
<p>And re: that &#8220;city in Georgia,&#8221; I lived in Georgia for a long time, and <a href="http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=786">Kennesaw</a> is the most racist, redneck town you&#8217;d never want to visit.  I&#8217;m sure whatever burglaries were avoided there have just been pushed to the next town over.  Poverty and crime don&#8217;t disappear just because you own a gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.democracyforvancouver.org/2007/12/19/this-is-why-guns-have-no-place-in-the-home/#comment-43110</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracyforvancouver.org/2007/12/19/this-is-why-guns-have-no-place-in-the-home/#comment-43110</guid>
		<description>Slim, you are correct on somethings, but not all guns are made to kill. Example: paintball guns, softpellet air guns, etc. When it comes to real firearms, yes they are made to kill. And yes, irresponsible/mental/felons (people) should not be allowed to own them. In fact, I believe there are laws on the books prohibiting them from having them.

I wish I could find the article so I could link to it, but it stated that close to 9 out of 10 households have firearms. Most people who have firearms are not irresponsible people, and are law abiding citizens. They have those weapons for many different reasons. But the biggest reason is to protect their family's when some scum breaks in. The police cannot be everywhere at once, and hidding in a closet may not help you. 

Also, a city in Georgia passed a ordnance that required all homeowners to have a firearm in their home. Crime dropped over 40% there. Makes a person wonder, doesn't it. Also, I have bet $100 to anti-guns people that guns do not kill. I offered to have a loaded pistol on a table between us, pointing at me, and we both sit and wait for it to shoot me. They have never taken the bet. And no, it's not a stupid saying that guns don't kill, people do. Firearms are a very deadly tool, used wrongly, and you have a tragedy. Same as any tool that is used wrongly, it's a accident waiting to happen.

People have the right in this country to have/have not firearms in their homes. And yes, that person you mentioned having more guns than TV's most likely irresponsible, or has a mental problem. IMO it is stupid to brag about how many firearms you may or may not have. That alone, and in it's self is a open invitation for problems. 

Arguing for or against firearms serves no purpose, as either side will not change their opinion. And I also feel sorry for the family, and before I make any judgments, I would like to know the full story of facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slim, you are correct on somethings, but not all guns are made to kill. Example: paintball guns, softpellet air guns, etc. When it comes to real firearms, yes they are made to kill. And yes, irresponsible/mental/felons (people) should not be allowed to own them. In fact, I believe there are laws on the books prohibiting them from having them.</p>
<p>I wish I could find the article so I could link to it, but it stated that close to 9 out of 10 households have firearms. Most people who have firearms are not irresponsible people, and are law abiding citizens. They have those weapons for many different reasons. But the biggest reason is to protect their family&#8217;s when some scum breaks in. The police cannot be everywhere at once, and hidding in a closet may not help you. </p>
<p>Also, a city in Georgia passed a ordnance that required all homeowners to have a firearm in their home. Crime dropped over 40% there. Makes a person wonder, doesn&#8217;t it. Also, I have bet $100 to anti-guns people that guns do not kill. I offered to have a loaded pistol on a table between us, pointing at me, and we both sit and wait for it to shoot me. They have never taken the bet. And no, it&#8217;s not a stupid saying that guns don&#8217;t kill, people do. Firearms are a very deadly tool, used wrongly, and you have a tragedy. Same as any tool that is used wrongly, it&#8217;s a accident waiting to happen.</p>
<p>People have the right in this country to have/have not firearms in their homes. And yes, that person you mentioned having more guns than TV&#8217;s most likely irresponsible, or has a mental problem. IMO it is stupid to brag about how many firearms you may or may not have. That alone, and in it&#8217;s self is a open invitation for problems. </p>
<p>Arguing for or against firearms serves no purpose, as either side will not change their opinion. And I also feel sorry for the family, and before I make any judgments, I would like to know the full story of facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slim</title>
		<link>http://www.democracyforvancouver.org/2007/12/19/this-is-why-guns-have-no-place-in-the-home/#comment-43109</link>
		<dc:creator>slim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracyforvancouver.org/2007/12/19/this-is-why-guns-have-no-place-in-the-home/#comment-43109</guid>
		<description>Allen,

If Mr. Osbrink had been wielding a baseball bat or a hammer, his wife would still be alive.  Those "tools" rarely kill by accident.  Bats, hammers and cars, and even kitchen knives, are things that &lt;em&gt;may&lt;/em&gt; kill, but that is not their intended purpose.  Guns are made to kill, and they kill with speed and great efficiency.   They are deadly weapons - the household equivalent of WMDs - and too dangerous to be so commonly (and casually) owned.

I know a man who has a tv in every room in his very large house, and brags that he has more guns than he has teevees.  None of them are rifles - they are all handguns or assault weapons.  Too often, he is the very sort of person who wants to own guns (the same people who buy &lt;a href="http://www.bumpernuts.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;bumper nuts&lt;/a&gt;) - as toys, status symbols, testosterone boosters, whatever.  This is not reasonable or rational in a civilized society. 

I feel terrible for what Mr. Osbrink and his family must be going through. But that does not change the fact that guns play a violent and unnecessary role in our society. If it were not for my heartbroken outrage that these things happen at all in this country, I would not have written this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allen,</p>
<p>If Mr. Osbrink had been wielding a baseball bat or a hammer, his wife would still be alive.  Those &#8220;tools&#8221; rarely kill by accident.  Bats, hammers and cars, and even kitchen knives, are things that <em>may</em> kill, but that is not their intended purpose.  Guns are made to kill, and they kill with speed and great efficiency.   They are deadly weapons - the household equivalent of WMDs - and too dangerous to be so commonly (and casually) owned.</p>
<p>I know a man who has a tv in every room in his very large house, and brags that he has more guns than he has teevees.  None of them are rifles - they are all handguns or assault weapons.  Too often, he is the very sort of person who wants to own guns (the same people who buy <a href="http://www.bumpernuts.com/">bumper nuts</a>) - as toys, status symbols, testosterone boosters, whatever.  This is not reasonable or rational in a civilized society. </p>
<p>I feel terrible for what Mr. Osbrink and his family must be going through. But that does not change the fact that guns play a violent and unnecessary role in our society. If it were not for my heartbroken outrage that these things happen at all in this country, I would not have written this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.democracyforvancouver.org/2007/12/19/this-is-why-guns-have-no-place-in-the-home/#comment-43108</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracyforvancouver.org/2007/12/19/this-is-why-guns-have-no-place-in-the-home/#comment-43108</guid>
		<description>g. kortes, yes that is the answer the bleeding hearts always throw out. What say you about knives? Baseball bats? Or autos?

Who said individuals were militias, except for you? I never mentioned it in my post, perhaps you may want to re-read it. You are correct when you say it is instantly deadly. So is a knife, a 4,000 lb auto, a properly swung baseball bat, etc, etc. The list can go on.

Because a few individuals are irresponsible, (read stupid) when handling a firearm, you think either more laws are needed, or they should be done away with. Do you know how many laws are on the books about firearms? Why aren't all of them being enforced?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>g. kortes, yes that is the answer the bleeding hearts always throw out. What say you about knives? Baseball bats? Or autos?</p>
<p>Who said individuals were militias, except for you? I never mentioned it in my post, perhaps you may want to re-read it. You are correct when you say it is instantly deadly. So is a knife, a 4,000 lb auto, a properly swung baseball bat, etc, etc. The list can go on.</p>
<p>Because a few individuals are irresponsible, (read stupid) when handling a firearm, you think either more laws are needed, or they should be done away with. Do you know how many laws are on the books about firearms? Why aren&#8217;t all of them being enforced?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g. kortes</title>
		<link>http://www.democracyforvancouver.org/2007/12/19/this-is-why-guns-have-no-place-in-the-home/#comment-43107</link>
		<dc:creator>g. kortes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 06:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracyforvancouver.org/2007/12/19/this-is-why-guns-have-no-place-in-the-home/#comment-43107</guid>
		<description>Same old stupid phrase, do guns kill or people kill?  What difference does it make?  Its instantly deadly.  Individuals are not "militias."   :shock:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same old stupid phrase, do guns kill or people kill?  What difference does it make?  Its instantly deadly.  Individuals are not &#8220;militias.&#8221;   <img src='http://www.democracyforvancouver.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_eek.gif' alt=':shock:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.democracyforvancouver.org/2007/12/19/this-is-why-guns-have-no-place-in-the-home/#comment-43105</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 06:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracyforvancouver.org/2007/12/19/this-is-why-guns-have-no-place-in-the-home/#comment-43105</guid>
		<description>Slim,
While you might be against having firearms in the home, a majority of people disagree with you. A firearm is a tool, properly used, will not hurt anyone. Same as a hammer, baseball bat, knife, etc. etc.

DID you know yesterday, 92,879,868 gun owners did not kill anyone? Yes, I made that figure up, but it does serve a point. It is evident that the deputy was not to smart in his handling of the gun. Not every firearm owner is irresponsible, but the bleeding hearts just can't see that.

In fact, please show me where a gun has killed someone. People kill, the weapon they use is just a tool. Why aren't you all upset about knives? That's what OJ used to kill two people. Drunk drivers kill, why aren't you all upset about people having cars in their driveways? It's the same damn thing, so get over the problem you have that some people may/maynot have guns in their homes. No one is forcing you to have one, it's a matter of choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slim,<br />
While you might be against having firearms in the home, a majority of people disagree with you. A firearm is a tool, properly used, will not hurt anyone. Same as a hammer, baseball bat, knife, etc. etc.</p>
<p>DID you know yesterday, 92,879,868 gun owners did not kill anyone? Yes, I made that figure up, but it does serve a point. It is evident that the deputy was not to smart in his handling of the gun. Not every firearm owner is irresponsible, but the bleeding hearts just can&#8217;t see that.</p>
<p>In fact, please show me where a gun has killed someone. People kill, the weapon they use is just a tool. Why aren&#8217;t you all upset about knives? That&#8217;s what OJ used to kill two people. Drunk drivers kill, why aren&#8217;t you all upset about people having cars in their driveways? It&#8217;s the same damn thing, so get over the problem you have that some people may/maynot have guns in their homes. No one is forcing you to have one, it&#8217;s a matter of choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g. kortes</title>
		<link>http://www.democracyforvancouver.org/2007/12/19/this-is-why-guns-have-no-place-in-the-home/#comment-43104</link>
		<dc:creator>g. kortes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 01:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracyforvancouver.org/2007/12/19/this-is-why-guns-have-no-place-in-the-home/#comment-43104</guid>
		<description>I am for a total ban on guns, automatic weapons, and such.   :idea:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am for a total ban on guns, automatic weapons, and such.   <img src='http://www.democracyforvancouver.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_idea.gif' alt=':idea:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bushtool</title>
		<link>http://www.democracyforvancouver.org/2007/12/19/this-is-why-guns-have-no-place-in-the-home/#comment-43103</link>
		<dc:creator>bushtool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracyforvancouver.org/2007/12/19/this-is-why-guns-have-no-place-in-the-home/#comment-43103</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.bradycampaign.org/facts/issues/?page=home" rel="nofollow"&gt;Why I don't keep a gun at home.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bradycampaign.org/facts/issues/?page=home">Why I don&#8217;t keep a gun at home.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.657 seconds -->
