this is why guns have no place in the home

murphy's law

UPDATE: I was wrong. Mr. Osbrink was trained in the use of weapons; he is an Iraq war vet who earned a Bronze Star for two instances of courageous action. Neither of these facts were included in the initial story I read this morning. I admit, when I read that Mr. Osbrink “shot and killed his wife as he was practicing his draw,” I saw a 24-y.o. wanna-be doing his best James West impression, heedless of the possible danger.

I still believe that handguns have no place in the home, and that rifles or shotguns only belong at gun clubs or on a hunt. Nothing about my initial, admitted, misreading of this story changes that. If Mr. Osbrink did not have that gun, his wife would still be alive.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

The other day, L. rolled his pair of socks down the stair rail; just as they reached the bottom, our greyhound Boomer stuck his nose around the corner and the sockball hit him right between the eyes. Boomer is an 80-lb. chicken, so he turned tail and loped ungracefully away, but what harm can a sockball do? But if it had been one of L.’s remote control cars, or one of my 3 lb. ball weights (both of which L. has been prohibited to roll down the stair rail), Boomer’s surprise would have been magnified to a possibly significant injury.

One of the first laws of nature is Shit Happens. The best way to survive in such a universe is to prohibit the most dangerous items or activities, and to strictly regulate the slightly less lethal ones, whether you are a government or a parent.

Case in point, from the Columbian this morning - a happy marriage, no kids, and still one spouse ends up dead:

Deputy-in-training fatally shoots wife

A man scheduled to start a new job with the Clark County Sheriff’s Office on Wednesday accidentally shot and killed his wife as he was practicing his draw, police in Tualatin, Ore., said.

Kimberly Lynn Osbrink, 23, of Tualatin died at OHSU Hospital in Portland, where she was taken after suffering a gunshot to the abdomen Sunday night.

Ryan Michael Osbrink, 24, had accepted a job offer from the sheriff’s office. He was to begin his training Wednesday to become a deputy.
…
According to police Capt. Jeff Groth, Ryan Osbrink had been practicing drawing his gun from a holster. Kimberly walked into the room and Ryan accidentally fired the gun, Groth said.

Although Groth characterized the shooting as an accident, he said the incident remains under investigation.

Ryan Osbrink used his own .45-caliber H & K semiautomatic pistol in the shooting. The Clark County Sheriff’s Office has not issued Osbrink a gun or other equipment.

Wednesday was to be a form of orientation for Osbrink, Bieber said. He would then take in-house training courses before heading to the state law enforcement academy.

If he had been practicing at the law enforcement academy, this wouldn’t have happened. It might not have happened if he was not a slightly testosterone-addled over-eager post-adolescent.

That a person can own a .45-caliber semiautomatic handgun without a training course or some proof of competence and basic safety knowledge is ludicrous. Chances are, Mrs. Osbrink would still be alive if her husband was even minimally trained.

[emphasis added.]

Last 2 posts in Dept. of just Sayin'

no, f*ck you. - May 12th, 2008
Clinton's not dead yet - May 7th, 2008

Sphere: Related Content

If you liked this post, feel free to subscribe to our rss feeds

This entry was written by slim and posted on December 19, 2007 at 11:14 am and filed under Dept. of just Sayin'. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

10 Comments so far (Add 1 more)

(listed oldest to newest)

Why I don’t keep a gun at home.

[reply to this]

1. Above written by bushtool on December 19th, 2007 at 12:21 pm (replies, if any, are attributed separately above).
I am for a total ban on guns, automatic weapons, and such.

[reply to this]

2. Above written by g. kortes on December 19th, 2007 at 5:11 pm (replies, if any, are attributed separately above).
Slim,
While you might be against having firearms in the home, a majority of people disagree with you. A firearm is a tool, properly used, will not hurt anyone. Same as a hammer, baseball bat, knife, etc. etc.

DID you know yesterday, 92,879,868 gun owners did not kill anyone? Yes, I made that figure up, but it does serve a point. It is evident that the deputy was not to smart in his handling of the gun. Not every firearm owner is irresponsible, but the bleeding hearts just can’t see that.

In fact, please show me where a gun has killed someone. People kill, the weapon they use is just a tool. Why aren’t you all upset about knives? That’s what OJ used to kill two people. Drunk drivers kill, why aren’t you all upset about people having cars in their driveways? It’s the same damn thing, so get over the problem you have that some people may/maynot have guns in their homes. No one is forcing you to have one, it’s a matter of choice.

[reply to this]

3. Above written by Allen on December 19th, 2007 at 10:37 pm (replies, if any, are attributed separately above).
Same old stupid phrase, do guns kill or people kill? What difference does it make? Its instantly deadly. Individuals are not “militias.”

[reply to this]

4. Above written by g. kortes on December 19th, 2007 at 10:57 pm (replies, if any, are attributed separately above).
g. kortes, yes that is the answer the bleeding hearts always throw out. What say you about knives? Baseball bats? Or autos?

Who said individuals were militias, except for you? I never mentioned it in my post, perhaps you may want to re-read it. You are correct when you say it is instantly deadly. So is a knife, a 4,000 lb auto, a properly swung baseball bat, etc, etc. The list can go on.

Because a few individuals are irresponsible, (read stupid) when handling a firearm, you think either more laws are needed, or they should be done away with. Do you know how many laws are on the books about firearms? Why aren’t all of them being enforced?

[reply to this]

5. Above written by Allen on December 20th, 2007 at 6:21 am (replies, if any, are attributed separately above).
Allen,

If Mr. Osbrink had been wielding a baseball bat or a hammer, his wife would still be alive. Those “tools” rarely kill by accident. Bats, hammers and cars, and even kitchen knives, are things that may kill, but that is not their intended purpose. Guns are made to kill, and they kill with speed and great efficiency. They are deadly weapons - the household equivalent of WMDs - and too dangerous to be so commonly (and casually) owned.

I know a man who has a tv in every room in his very large house, and brags that he has more guns than he has teevees. None of them are rifles - they are all handguns or assault weapons. Too often, he is the very sort of person who wants to own guns (the same people who buy bumper nuts) - as toys, status symbols, testosterone boosters, whatever. This is not reasonable or rational in a civilized society.

I feel terrible for what Mr. Osbrink and his family must be going through. But that does not change the fact that guns play a violent and unnecessary role in our society. If it were not for my heartbroken outrage that these things happen at all in this country, I would not have written this post.

[reply to this]

6. Above written by slim on December 20th, 2007 at 9:18 am (replies, if any, are attributed separately above).
Slim, you are correct on somethings, but not all guns are made to kill. Example: paintball guns, softpellet air guns, etc. When it comes to real firearms, yes they are made to kill. And yes, irresponsible/mental/felons (people) should not be allowed to own them. In fact, I believe there are laws on the books prohibiting them from having them.

I wish I could find the article so I could link to it, but it stated that close to 9 out of 10 households have firearms. Most people who have firearms are not irresponsible people, and are law abiding citizens. They have those weapons for many different reasons. But the biggest reason is to protect their family’s when some scum breaks in. The police cannot be everywhere at once, and hidding in a closet may not help you.

Also, a city in Georgia passed a ordnance that required all homeowners to have a firearm in their home. Crime dropped over 40% there. Makes a person wonder, doesn’t it. Also, I have bet $100 to anti-guns people that guns do not kill. I offered to have a loaded pistol on a table between us, pointing at me, and we both sit and wait for it to shoot me. They have never taken the bet. And no, it’s not a stupid saying that guns don’t kill, people do. Firearms are a very deadly tool, used wrongly, and you have a tragedy. Same as any tool that is used wrongly, it’s a accident waiting to happen.

People have the right in this country to have/have not firearms in their homes. And yes, that person you mentioned having more guns than TV’s most likely irresponsible, or has a mental problem. IMO it is stupid to brag about how many firearms you may or may not have. That alone, and in it’s self is a open invitation for problems.

Arguing for or against firearms serves no purpose, as either side will not change their opinion. And I also feel sorry for the family, and before I make any judgments, I would like to know the full story of facts.

[reply to this]

7. Above written by Allen on December 20th, 2007 at 10:25 am (replies, if any, are attributed separately above).
Allen,

Let’s get to the facts (real, not imagined). These numbers are variously from the Police Foundation in DC, the ATF and the FBI:

• There are about 192 million privately-owned firearms in the U.S., of which 65 million are handguns. About 39% (far from 9 out of 10) of households have guns.

• About 30,000 people are killed by firearms each year in the U.S., of which about 39% are murders, 57% are suicides and 2% are accidents (the balance are unknown).

• In 2005, there were only 143 justifiable homicides (out of approximately 30,000 firearm deaths) in the U.S. That means that only 0.5% of deaths were self-defense shootings. Maybe we should have 99.5% fewer guns in the country, too, if only 0.5% are being used in self-defense.

• An abused woman is 6 times more likely to be murdered if there is a handgun in the home.

• The presence of a gun in the home triples the risk of a homicide in the home, and quintuples the risk of a suicide.

• 8-10 children (under 19) are killed with guns EVERY DAY in the U.S.

Now, why is it that we need these things again? What other “tool” do we allow to be owned so widely that is so dangerous to innocent people when used for its intended purpose? Only cigarettes come to mind, and with the exception of second-hand smoke, the ones who end up dead aren’t innocent bystanders.

And as to your comment that, “IMO it is stupid to brag about how many firearms you may or may not have,” you contradicted that by saying, “a city in Georgia passed a ordnance that required all homeowners to have a firearm in their home… Makes a person wonder, doesn’t it.”

So, which is it - should you advertise that you own a gun, or not?

And re: that “city in Georgia,” I lived in Georgia for a long time, and Kennesaw is the most racist, redneck town you’d never want to visit. I’m sure whatever burglaries were avoided there have just been pushed to the next town over. Poverty and crime don’t disappear just because you own a gun.

[reply to this]

8. Above written by slim on December 20th, 2007 at 12:17 pm (replies, if any, are attributed separately above).
Slim, your correct about rednecks in Georgia. That ruling on homeowners is not enforced. But what if the next town over had the same law? And the one after that and so on. Where would the scum go? And bragging about having a stockpile of weapons is stupid. In Kennesaw, they don’t have to talk about it, almost everyone knows.

But the fact remains, you cannot lump all firearm owners as being irresponsible. It may sound good, but it’s not the truth, other wise millions of people would be in jail.

Everyone to their own opinion, I am not going to argue over this, too much to do in life.

Anyway, Slim, hope you and yours have a Merry Christmas.

[reply to this]

9. Above written by Allen on December 20th, 2007 at 3:00 pm (replies, if any, are attributed separately above).
Same to you, Allen.

[reply to this]

10. Above written by slim on December 20th, 2007 at 3:19 pm (replies, if any, are attributed separately above).

Moderation Active: Comments are open on this post and will be moderated (i.e. the post will not appear immediately, please don't submit twice !)