headermask image

header image

In My Opinion


I knew it was just a matter of time. The Columbian has finally printed an Editorial (SPEAK UP VOTERS) I can agree with.

The Columbian is also right that there are some crucial races and issues on Tuesday’s Ballot. Too bad they have taken the role of Cheer Leaders for the Incumbents and increasing taxes instead of just printing the facts.

In Friday’s Sport’s Section you may have missed the article “Transportation cost drive Pioneers out“. Who are the Pioneers? They are Vancouver’s Hockey Team that apparently had to withdraw from the World Hockey Association because of lack of support and funds.

Now what does hockey have to do with the current election. A Lot. Hockey is but one instance of the current Council’s inability to prioritize spending and unwillingness to listen to those they claim to represent, brings to light their past misdeeds and what we can expect from them if re-elected.

Not long ago our current City Council Members over the objection of Voters and Petitioners spent hundreds of thousands of your tax dollars trying to bring, without a vote of the people, a Hockey Rink to Downtown Vancouver. In their futile attempt to raise required private matching fund, they agreed to enter into a shady deal that would, without following standard legal procedures such as “Request for Proposals” favor special interest. This deal would have allowed an Anonymous Group of Donors, in return for 5 million dollars in matching fund to be granted the Naming Rights to the Hockey Rink along most of the money making service contracts such as, Food and Beverage, Advertising, Janitorial, Cleaning and Maintenance, etc. Fortunately for the tax payers, the council was forced to drop the Hockey Rink idea.

Do we really want to re-elect those who would support shady deals, agree to by pass the voters or whose only solution to problems or ideas is to raise our sales, property and other taxes. Can we rely on a news medial that glosses over the misdeeds of incumbents? I think not.

If just those who voted to overturn the Port of Vancouver’s outrageous attempt to raise our property taxes 132% takes the Columbian’s advice, we can and should defeat the incumbents and the legislatures attempt to eliminate among other ballot measures the 60 % majority requirement to increase school taxes. Please join me in voting for Charlie Stemper, Pat Campbell, David Kallstrom, and Jerry Oliver.

We deserve to be represented not dictated to.

L. M. Patella
CDR USN (ret)

Last 2 posts in Clark County

Last 2 posts in Local elections

Last 2 posts in Local issues

Sphere: Related Content

If you liked this post, feel free to subscribe to our rss feeds

One Comment

(listed oldest to newest)
  1. I think it is significant to note that yesterday was the sixth anniversary marking Larry Patella’s defeat in court after the City of Vancouver sued him and fove of his close personal friends.

    Mr. Patella and C. paid an attorner $60,000 to lose that lawsuit. This piece of his today is in stark contrast to the facts, as were related from this piece that ran in the Columbian on November 2, 2001…

    The entire article was retrieved from the columbian archives, and can be viwed in it’s entirety at this Clarkblog link:

    http://clarkblog.org/index.php/topic,2218.msg10936.html#msg10936

    Judge rules against Events Center opponents on two issues

    JEFFREY MIZE, columbian staff writer
    November 2, 2001; Page c3

    It took Superior Court Judge Robert Harris just a few hours to reject the latest legal challenge to Vancouver’s proposed special events center. Harris heard oral arguments Thursday morning and ruled in the afternoon, slapping down both procedural arguments attorney Mark A. Erikson raised in court.

    Larry Patella, a leader in the so-far unsuccessful effort to force a public vote on the $62.7 million project, said he wasn’t surprised.

    “What happens next is we appeal,” Patella said. “I left the courtroom with the impression the judge made up his mind before the thing even started because there’s no way he could have digested all that information and make a decision so quickly.”

    City Attorney Ted Gathe said he was confident the city had complied with all procedural requirements and will be ready to defend the city’s position should Patella take the case to the Washington Court of Appeals.

    [Reply]

    1. Above comment written by Chief WahooNo Gravatar on November 3rd, 2007 at 5:43 pm (replies, if any, are attributed separately above).
Moderation Active: Comments are open on this post and will be moderated (i.e. the post will not appear immediately, please don't submit twice !)

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*
This site is using OpenAvatar based on

Subscribe without commenting