headermask image

header image

Waldman tears Russert a new one

Over at American Prospect, republished by Common Dreams, I could not help but notice this article, it being a fact that major media control of our country is a major concern to me. Paul Waldman talks about the sound bites that pretend to be Democratic Presidential debates and Russert’s question to the candidates about their favorite bible verse:

When Obama finished his answer, Russert said to the other candidates, “I want to give everyone a chance in this. You just take 10 seconds.” Predictable banality ensued. A foreign visitor unfamiliar with our presidential campaigns might have scratched her head and said, “This is how you decide who will lead your country?”

Waldman goes on to fashion a perfect answer to what he considers an inane question:

I have a fantasy that at one of these moments, a candidate will say, “You know what, Tim, I’m not going to answer that question. This is serious business. And you, sir, are a disgrace. You have in front of you a group of accomplished, talented leaders, one of whom will in all likelihood be the next president of the United States. You can ask them whatever you want. And you choose to engage in this ridiculous gotcha game, thinking up inane questions you hope will trick us into saying something controversial or stupid. Your fondest hope is that the answer to your question will destroy someone’s campaign. You’re not a journalist, you’re the worst kind of hack, someone whose efforts not only don’t contribute to a better informed electorate, they make everyone dumber. So no, I’m not going to stand here and try to come up with the most politically safe Bible verse to cite. Is that the best you can do?”

Now that kind of answer would certainly get my support and my vote.

Last 2 posts in 2008 Election

Last 2 posts in Media

Last 2 posts in Religion

Sphere: Related Content

If you liked this post, feel free to subscribe to our rss feeds

2 Comments so far (Add 1 more)

(listed oldest to newest)
  1. On first glance, I thought Waldman was talking about Lou Brancaccio when he said:

    “You’re not a journalist, you’re the worst kind of hack, someone whose efforts not only don’t contribute to a better informed electorate, they make everyone dumber. So no, I’m not going to stand here and try to come up with the most politically safe Bible verse to cite. Is that the best you can do?”

    [reply to this]

    1. Above written by Chief WahooNo Gravatar on November 2nd, 2007 at 5:56 am (replies, if any, are attributed separately above).
  2. A safe and sensible quote:

    “True religion in the eyes of the Father is this: To look after the widow and orphan in their plight and to keep oneself unspotted by the world.” (James 1:27)

    As you see this is beyound sectarianism.

    [reply to this]

    2. Above written by Pat CampbellNo Gravatar on November 2nd, 2007 at 2:48 pm (replies, if any, are attributed separately above).
Moderation Active: Comments are open on this post and will be moderated (i.e. the post will not appear immediately, please don't submit twice !)

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*
This site is using OpenAvatar based on

Subscribe without commenting