Comments on: Lifepac endorsed candidate running as a Democrat http://www.democracyforvancouver.org/2007/10/10/lifepac-endorsed-candidate-running-as-a-democrat/ Politics of the People Sat, 05 Jul 2008 17:47:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: allfair http://www.democracyforvancouver.org/2007/10/10/lifepac-endorsed-candidate-running-as-a-democrat/#comment-43468 allfair Wed, 16 Jan 2008 06:20:08 +0000 http://www.democracyforvancouver.org/2007/10/10/lifepac-endorsed-candidate-running-as-a-democrat/#comment-43468 Take a look at a survey that anyone has done, and it's just that, a survey. You have an "option" and pick "the best one", not necessarily the perfect one. Too bad surveys don't allow total freedom of speach, but rather give leading questions that people use against others when the time is right! Take a look at a survey that anyone has done, and it’s just that, a survey. You have an “option” and pick “the best one”, not necessarily the perfect one. Too bad surveys don’t allow total freedom of speach, but rather give leading questions that people use against others when the time is right!

]]> By: arturo http://www.democracyforvancouver.org/2007/10/10/lifepac-endorsed-candidate-running-as-a-democrat/#comment-41214 arturo Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:03:25 +0000 http://www.democracyforvancouver.org/2007/10/10/lifepac-endorsed-candidate-running-as-a-democrat/#comment-41214 Someone needs to audit Lifepacs books. Here we go again. The only legitimate use for Lifepac is to decide who not to vote for. Someone needs to audit Lifepacs books. Here we go again. The only legitimate use for Lifepac is to decide who not to vote for.

]]> By: Aneurin http://www.democracyforvancouver.org/2007/10/10/lifepac-endorsed-candidate-running-as-a-democrat/#comment-41213 Aneurin Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:16:22 +0000 http://www.democracyforvancouver.org/2007/10/10/lifepac-endorsed-candidate-running-as-a-democrat/#comment-41213 UPDATE: It's not PDC regs that require partisan identification, but <a href="http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=42.17.510" rel="nofollow">RCW</a>: For partisan office, if a candidate has expressed a party or independent preference on the declaration of candidacy, that party or independent designation shall be clearly identified in electioneering communications, independent expenditures, or political advertising. UPDATE: It’s not PDC regs that require partisan identification, but RCW:

For partisan office, if a candidate has expressed a party or independent preference on the declaration of candidacy, that party or independent designation shall be clearly identified in electioneering communications, independent expenditures, or political advertising.

]]>