Judge Strikes Down Part of Patriot Act:
A federal judge struck down a key part of the USA Patriot Act on Thursday in a ruling that defended the need for judicial oversight of laws and bashed Congress for passing a law that makes possible “far-reaching invasions of liberty.”
U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero immediately stayed the effect of his ruling, allowing the government time to appeal. Justice Department spokesman Dean Boyd said: “We are reviewing the decision and considering our options at this time.”
…
The ACLU had challenged the law on behalf of an Internet service provider, complaining that the law allowed the FBI to demand records without the kind of court supervision required for other government searches. Under the law, investigators can issue so-called national security letters to entities like Internet service providers and phone companies and demand customers’ phone and Internet records.In his ruling, Marrero said much more was at stake than questions about the national security letters.
He said Congress, in the original USA Patriot Act and less so in a 2005 revision, had essentially tried to legislate how the judiciary must review challenges to the law. If done to other bills, they ultimately could all “be styled to make the validation of the law foolproof.”
John Marshall would be so proud.
[emphasis added.]
Last 2 posts in Constitution
- on the brink of real change - August 20th, 2008
- Parties Suck, Especially Two of Them - August 13th, 2008
Last 2 posts in Domestic spying
- I Almost Forgot, It's Always the Dems Fault - August 19th, 2008
- they're not crimes, they're only "violations" of "laws" - August 12th, 2008
Last 2 posts in Privacy
- Time Magazine: We Don't Report the News, We Write it - March 18th, 2008
- the slippery slope of treating kids as adults - November 30th, 2007
If you liked this post, feel free to subscribe to our rss feeds










2 Comments so far (Add 1 more)
(listed oldest to newest)