headermask image

header image

Libby guilty, momentum builds for Cheney’s impeachment


Conservative writer Andrew Sullivan builds a case for Cheney’s impeachment in the wake of the Libby verdict:

Something is rotten in the heart of Washington; and it lies in the vice-president’s office. The salience of this case is obvious. What it is really about - what it has always been about - is whether this administration deliberately misled the American people about WMD intelligence before the war. The risks Cheney took to attack Wilson, the insane over-reaction that otherwise very smart men in this administration engaged in to rebut a relatively trivial issue: all this strongly implies the fact they were terrified that the full details of their pre-war WMD knowledge would come out. Fitzgerald could smell this. He was right to pursue it, and to prove that a brilliant, intelligent, sane man like Libby would risk jail to protect his bosses. What was he really trying to hide? We now need a Congressional investigation to find out more, to subpoena Cheney and, if he won’t cooperate, consider impeaching him.

Locally, we have a huge disconnect here between certain elected officials and the voters when even holding a hearing to discuss impeachment, from Congressman Jay Inslee:

“These are my friends,” he says, “so this is difficult to say. But all impeachment would do is rally support for George Bush. Among Republicans, it would make him a hero. And it would make it that much harder to end this war.”

to the Governor:

Gregoire called the Iraq protests a distraction, adding she was “not going to bring up Iraq at all” in her talks with Washington state’s congressional delegation. Instead, she said she would talk about federal budget cuts, health care and a bill to reauthorize the federal No Child Left Behind education law.

to Senator Patty Murray:

Alex Glass, a Murray spokeswoman, said that when Murray was in the Washington state capital of Olympia last week, she met with Democratic leaders and rank-and-file members in the House and Senate. Her message was simple, Glass said: “‘I have two words for anyone who wants to impeach the president: Dick Cheney.’ “

to Vancouver’s very own State Senator Craig Pridemore:

Sen. Craig Pridemore, D-Vancouver, a member of the committee, opposed hearing the impeachment resolution and left before testimony on it began.

So now that we have a guilty verdict of the Vice President’s right hand man, will these members of the opposition party sing a different tune? If a conservative columnist can call for impeachment proceedings, why are Democratic electeds so willing to forgo this option, or even discuss it?

Last 2 posts in 49th Leg District

Last 2 posts in Bush crime family

Last 2 posts in Democrats

Last 2 posts in Murray, Sen Patty

Sphere: Related Content

If you liked this post, feel free to subscribe to our rss feeds

2 Comments so far (Add 1 more)

(listed oldest to newest)
  1. The Dem electeds are afraid to bite the hand that feeds them. Only a couple of them are willing to take on the media, the corporatists and the lobbyists who put and keep them in power. It is much easier and safer for their careers to just go along.

    When you have a good thing going, why rock the boat? Because it’s the right thing to do? Who cares about that? Doing the right thing does not get you re-elected.

    [Reply]

    1. Above comment written by bushtoolNo Gravatar on March 6th, 2007 at 4:41 pm (replies, if any, are attributed separately above).
  2. Here is another “I told you so” about the spineless Dems being part of the problem.

    March 6, 2007

    A Willful Abandonment of Progressive Ideals
    Dump the Dems, Unite Against the War

    By JOSHUA FRANK

    We should have known it was coming. Even though the Democratic Party rode the antiwar wave in to Congress last November they’ve done little since to end the bloody war in Iraq. Just last week House Democrats met to discuss how best to halt Bush’s request to send more troops into the region but couldn’t come to an agreement on whether or not to put any restrictions on the administration’s plea for an additional $93 billion to continue the occupation. The only way to stop the war, as Sen. Russ Feingold understands well, is to cease all funding for the ongoing tragedy. But the majority of Democrats, already preparing for the next round of elections, aren’t about to step up and represent their constituents.

    Here is the rest of the article.

    [Reply]

    2. Above comment written by bushtoolNo Gravatar on March 6th, 2007 at 8:06 pm (replies, if any, are attributed separately above).
Moderation Active: Comments are open on this post and will be moderated (i.e. the post will not appear immediately, please don't submit twice !)

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*
This site is using OpenAvatar based on

Subscribe without commenting